It's innocent, immeasurable immersion into inter-dimensional introspection, isometrically intending isomorphic ideology interpretation. Intense isolation is indicative in infinitely intrusive, inward iterations. Intrinsic itinerary indicates inharmonious intentions internally, inscribing idealistic informatics. Imaginative Implications?..... It is I........I is intolerable.

I'm bipolar

Hi, I'm thomas :)...I'm obsessed with as much music as i can find. I don't rate music for the sake of it or to prove any critical point - I do it because it is very fun and I connect with similar souls by delegating numerical value to subjective notions. I love: sharing that previously mentioned oblique sensation by finding camaraderie, introducing people to things that make them feel more vividly about themselves or music they already liked, and making people unexpectedly happy by gently suggesting them to listen to something new. Why? because its awesome, because statistics involve feelings, and there is no suitable way I can separate that which I believe is theoretically indifferent. Basically, I just wanna share the way I feel about certain musical stuff and also attempt to understand, synergize with, and adopt the form of musical entertainment you feel, too... Together-ness... Because that is what i feel is important.

I like - Listening - Learning - Altruism - Acceptance - Connection - Philosophy (and its Meta-theories of each specific discipline) = (Metaphysics, Logic, Epistemology, Existentialism, Ontology, Semantics, Ethics, Aesthetics Phenomenology and etc.) - LGBTQIA - Psychology, Cognitive behaviorial sciences, and Neuroscience - Meta- Consciousness and Meta- Cognizance - Mathematics, Newtonian physics, general and special relativity, and quantum mechanics - Ancient and current religions, sociology and anthropology - debate and deep, open honest conversation - ego and mental programming deconstruction techniques - meditation (with music and through traditional means) - Dreaming, contemplation, imagination (they are all transcendentals that come from the subspace of subconsciousness, which correlates to the connection through consciousness we all have) - pharmacology :) - watching lectures and studying online courses - Cosmology, Astrophysics, astronomy - talking to people on discord - manga/anime, Star Trek, some comedy cartoons - Dogs and Cats - open mindedness - whatever that means - acceptance of new ideas with a logical reason as a foundation

I dislike - people who say they love music and dont know the internet exists (kidding), closed mindedness - whatever that means - anger and hatred in general - any form of unacceptance based on things we don't control or are born with (discrimination) - people who dont like to be honest with themselves and have open and blunt conversations... with lots of kindness and understanding going ignored - also dislike - most country music, most radio pop, most regular blues, most rap rock and nu metal, most traditional black metal, all boy band, all teen pop, most glam rock and metal, most emo (by itself), and most singer/songwriter and acoustic rock - of course there are exceptions, and im not stating that they are objectively anything.... just not for me currently. - One last thing, im not hateful or judging of anyone who likes only a few genres and doesnt branch outwards to more; but, admittedly, its going to be most difficult to have a connection with those kinds of music listeners. The ones who dont like anything outside of their immediate comforts - oh well, im judging now....a conundrum

My gamertag on xbox live is - Symmetry7

P.S. I am "nerdy enough to learn everyone's rating scale" If i can do it, you probably can too.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Music is music, for the sake of whatever you wish. NO GENRE, SOUND, STYLE OR IDEALISM ABOUT MUSIC IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER OR OPPOSITE. EVERYTHING HAS ITS PLACE. I say it as a matter of fact because I want to believe that it is that way. I think production in general, songwriting technique, emotional compositional value, amount and type of compression used, the dynamics of instrument interplay, and the technical decomposition of notes and scales are just puzzle pieces without definition. As soon as you think you have critiqued something to its fullest, most intensely intellectual perameters, someone else (or some other idea) comes along and makes what you did seem stupid or wasteful. You can't always like something the same way, all the time.

You, as a music critic, are not right about those special things that you think you can see that are different than what others are able to derive from the patterns; and, no one is wrong for not appreciating or idolizing those facets, either. Tonality, Chord Progression, Timbre, Chromaticism, Time Signature - Like my friend "Saturnis / SOL" has stated, "It's about hearing the fundamental infinite of melodies and chords. About hearing every little detail, nuance, and characteristic to maximize your own enjoyment and emotional reactions, and possibly open yourself up emotionally to music previously inaccessible or nonsensical." Indeed, music is a culmination of infinities... an indescribablely complex, subspace frequency flux of limits, scattered among endless other wefting and wafting patterns which refract from deeper orders. An enfolding of dynamically convergent sonic entities is a viewpoint I enjoy, but it is only one of many that may be true. Simply put, you are not the god of good music. You are a voice in a choir. If your individuality is defined by only what you like, or what makes you comfortable, then that is the epitome of shallow.

Most music is average. thats kinda the nature of...um...nature. Statistically speaking.

Whatever comes out of my speakers, no matter what digital footprints were imposed, or how analog and natural it sounds, I don't care. The journey, the exploration factors, the sound-aesthesia it presents and the emotions it wraps you in...That is all that matters to me.

I'm guessing that in order to think, we must also be...Maybe..... If this isn't a simulation (ps, its probably a simulation) sanity loss, or solipsism, and logic is absolutely paradoxical, (and all our thoughts are our own, and we can organize information intuitively, recognize structures of heirarchy and holarchy...etc....) then consciousness may exist as an infinitely layered, dimension-less, "balancing and unbalancing" set of algorithms, all of which seem to flow into other macro and micro states, kaleidoscopically. Who knows...Is there a benefit to question individuality or is it an endless, mass amalgamtion of leptons, bosons, and fermions collapsing into the void? Do we program our sets of equations unknowingly, subconsciously, in order to comprehend a limitless, interconnected system, in which all the nodes are universes unto themselves? Or are we truly, only separate and different? Is the only ineffability, constant change? Questions necessitate thought, and thought requires an axiom as firmware. What happens when you learn how to write your own operating system code? Logic becomes feeling and finite sets become open sets. Fold in to Fold out. Learn your "self", "soul", "subtle body", "relationship with god" or whatever you please. Any or none, or both?... ALL SEEMS TO BE ONE - English language deficiencies encountered....

"Of course, a macroscopic object like the moon has position and momentum values whose indeterminacies are so small that that we can, for all practical purposes, treat them as if they were perfectly well-defined, independent of observation. But the question here is a philosophical one. In principle, the moon is a physical system that can be described using quantum mechanics. Even though the uncertainties in its position and momentum are so exceedingly small that they can be completely neglected, nevertheless they are both, in principle, nonzero. The physicist can ignore this. The philosopher can not."

I could be wrong about anything and everything i have said. its always a work in progress, and not in a vaccum. I think our connection through consciousness is the key to finding ubiquitous love and understanding....maybe im crazy and nonsensical - i can live with that.....havent figured out how sociopaths and psychopaths fit into this love triangle, but logically there must be some solution.....right?