How is this a furry game? I'm genuinely asking, because if every game with any anthropomorphized animal-like protagonist is automatically a furry game, then we have to add the tag to most of the PS1-PS2 era platformers as well. Is Sly Raccoon a furry game? Is Crash Bandicoot? Sonic the Hedgehog? All of those have the literal animal names in the titles, while i don't even really know what animal Sybil is supposed to represent. Although maybe that is the delineation?
I agree with you but I also think this is clearly more furry than those with the… focus in her design. Those mascots are more cartoon animal than modern furry aesthetic. I just always find this an interesting thought experiment
To be honest furry is a bit of a weird tag anyway. Anthropomorphic animals are so widely applicable and ubiquitous I think the tag isn’t as meaningful as tagging something for having a high fantasy aesthetic etc. The cases where it actually helps define the game seem really niche, but I’m getting beyond the scope of the comment box here
To be honest furry is a bit of a weird tag anyway. Anthropomorphic animals are so widely applicable and ubiquitous I think the tag isn’t as meaningful as tagging something for having a high fantasy aesthetic etc. The cases where it actually helps define the game seem really niche, but I’m getting beyond the scope of the comment box here
We already treat undead, zombie, vampire and giant monster sort-of the same way. It's inconsistent and totally arbitrary to treat furry differently.