The Koch funded study is fine in and of itself. It is a Pro warming study, but it is not, that I can discover, a pro AGW study. My contention is that humans have little to no effect on the situation and can do little to nothing about any amount of warming, even though the numbers are nowhere near the horror stores that have paraded around for the last 25 years. While it helps to have more science than less, the study doesn't actually dispute that the climate scientists were not operating honestly. So, I was probably too pleased to see them caught in their own lies, but in no way have the lies been mitigated or the human aspect been proved.
So in a nutshell, I don't object to noticing climate change, I object to colusion and misrepresentation, which still happened, and I object to holding humanity responsible through inneffective and costly legislations, whcihc seems to be dying out as an idea.
While the volcanic emmisions do release greenhouse gasses, the entire compounds considered actually cause a net cooling, not warming. Also bursting fissures (such as Laki) create cooling effects.
Comments