Charts Genres Community
Charts Genres Community Settings
Login

Game collection

Ratings

Recently added

See all recent

ratings explanation:

5.0 (mental health supplement) = one of the best releases from a favorite act/ a genre-transcending work/ possibly a “masterpiece”
4.5 (awesome) = a standout record/ a really good effort from a favorite act
4.0 (good) = a balanced well thought-out work/ a consistently rewarding listen/ a genre highlight
3.5 (nice/somewhat flawed) = a slightly above average effort/ a good record with some flaws
3.0 (bearable) = a disposable listen with a few rewarding moments/ a severely flawed record with hints of goodness
2.5 (muzak) = an inoffensively bad record (i.e. the effort is still evident)/ background music
2.0 (...you're kidding me, right?) = a record that fails to achieve whatever intended result almost completely/ an unexpectedly bad record/ baffling (in a bad way)
1.5 (sham) = a contrived self-indulgent affair/ artist’s ego vehicle/ playacting/ bad carbon copy off a better source (sources)
1.0 (utter shite) = unjustifiable
0.5 (brain dead) = monkeys make better music

------------------------------------------------------------------

notes on rating policy:

Constantly reevaluating stuff and attitudes towards rating in general, though within the established rating system (since changing that has proven to be a real pain in the ass).

The 5.0 rating is essentially the most subjective rating often ensuing from the most immediate impression (or memory thereof), but is at the same time meant to lend a certain weight to a record which I grew to consider important for one reason or another. Because of its tricky nature this category tends to get a bit messy, though I've recently cleared out (i.e. downrated) all compilation/compiled-albums releases, reserving it solely for albums -- LPs/EPs (the only compilation in the 5.0 category at the moment is Disco Inferno's In Debt, which happens to be my favorite DI release and that rare instance when a compiled CD flows better than most albums would).

Records in the 4.5 and 4.0 categories are considered almost equally good, though a 4.5 rating implicates a potential rise to 5.0 more so than a 4.0 rating. Same thing with the lower rating categories where chances of potential rise decrease linearly with the rating.

upd. ^ pretty much irrelevant as of now

Comments

  • Previous comments (24) Loading...
  • doru649 2014-02-18 00:34:22.279358+00
    I think me and him have quite opposite taste
    https://rateyourmusic.com/...iting_its_tail/
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • mookid 2014-02-24 21:53:32.294868+00
    hi man
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • mookid 2014-02-25 15:58:27.600498+00
    listening to anything cool today?
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • mookid 2014-02-25 16:06:57.529965+00
    so you like music that you don't like? Hmm... I've heard it's not very good.
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • mookid 2014-02-25 16:12:28.454402+00
    you type in a really cool way o_o
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • doru649 2014-03-04 01:42:00.779874+00
    just sent you a recc/download link; let me know if you like that tape ;)
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • ... 2015-10-11 04:10:49.627891+00
    I love your taste!
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • messyanne 2016-01-19 22:14:13.450795+00
    aren't we just monkey's making music?
    reply
    • More replies New replies ) Loading...
  • More comments New comments (0) Loading...
Please login or sign up to comment.

Contributor Stats

User #163,056

Joined 2007-01-28T19:53:50Z

Music
Film
Games
Community
Examples
1980s-1996
23 mar 2015
8 apr - 12 may 2015
1998-05
Report
Download
Image 1 of 2